thestig, 2/1

The study of postmodern architecture is relevant to critical media studies because it represents the achievements and power (in the sense of creativity and forward thinking) of a nation, as does the media. In Tuesday’s PowerPoint, we were taken on a journey: from the beautiful skyscrapers of the Far East to the magnificent skyline of a city full of ugly buildings (NYC). I’m glad to be studying the actual rules of postmodern architecture features, as I have always been interested in the design of a building or a space, but have never known the terminology to define the various features. I enjoyed looking at the courthouse because it reminded me of my first realization of what the architecture of a building can say about what goes on within the building. We all grew up learning that buildings with columns, like the White House, have them to represent power. The courthouse downtown was influenced by this notion, thus tradition reinterpreted. I appreciate this type of architecture because it represents the past but also reflects forward thinking.

After looking back on our field trip downtown, specifically thinking about the bus station, I decided that I’m very confused with the work. Many of us pointed out that we thought the building looked like waves, signifying that we were on the ocean, which we’re not – we’re in a city. And the office building next door doesn’t share any of the stylistic features; who would have known they are associated with one another? My question is this: do we as a culture like seeing buildings, like the bus station, that are so out of place because they bring us to the place (like the ocean), that it is supposed to represent?

I compliment the architect for trying something different and cool, but how could you have forgotten to put up a clock!