Sunday, November 1, 2009

Ace Ventura, 10/29

Since I just realized I wrote my blog on the wrong author, I'll reflect on our class about Adorno and Horkheimer. Much like the theorists that we have read lately, Horkheimer and Adorno talk about ideologies in our society. One particular thing that I found interesting was the fact that fighting these ideologies and attempting to be "different" is almost impossible. This is made evident in the fact that we, as a societal whole, has created "types" of people. People that try to be different we have labeled as "punk" or "hippies" or "emo". By applying a label to these people, we avoid anybody becoming different because they can't escape these ideological categories that we have placed them in to. In this way, it seems that the ruling class is able to stay in power because they can even exert their ideas onto these people that are attempting to break away. This is similar to Benjamin's idea of the "waning of affect". When a person for the first time pushes the ideological envelope and attempts to be different, it can be shocking and definitely draws attention. But once it has been done many times by many different people, it loses its value and can now be put into a category. And this comfortability that we have with reproduction allows us to create a signifier for this type of person so that we can readily identify it.

1 comment:

CMC300 said...

First of all really watch out for the word-length because I can't give you full credit; however, I can tell you that you have written a good and solid blog. You talk about Horkheimer and Adorno's ideas of culture and ideology, and yet a lot of what your talking about can easily be tied back to Hebdige and Jenkins. Also Lyotard plays his role with the avant-garde aspect of culture. Please take the time to elaborate on your ideas and find real world examples that relate to the material covered in class. :)