post-it note, 1/31/2009

After learning about post-modern architecture, I began to wonder how buildings known for such design could also be safe. Moving away from structure toward aesthetics creates an emphasis on the look of the building rather than the structural integrity. The structural integrity has been understood in the past primarily because the façades that were visible were seen as more appealing than the industrious materials hidden beneath. But buildings, such as Pompidou, exemplify the elements of architecture in order to create interest and define a new design ideal rather than reinventing the column and cross-beam. This technique has sparked in me an interest in architecture, such as a look behind the scenes of a sporting event creates interest even in people that did not like the sport before the tour. Being in the locker room and being where the players spend several hours a week creates a profound understanding. The perspective of an inside-out building in every aspect, including form before function rather than function before form, as in the past, allows those who do not read blueprints to see the inner workings of a structure that otherwise would have to fit and curve intricately within the walls. The colors used for the utility pipes and air ducts are the artistic interest given to the building that otherwise would not matter. In this way, the entire building is art. The entire building can be seen as long as access is allowed inside and out. The environment of the Pompidou reeks of creativity and uniqueness which is also the goal of the artists who have artwork on display inside the building as well. Therefore, the structure of the museum is a permanent exhibit to the Pompidou. This exhibit draws many people to its doors and efficiently sells itself. The building has drawn me in, and I have only seen photos of the outside.